Skip to Content
Skip to Content

Preparation Program Approval

Learn more about how Ohio is performing on Preparation Program Approval in the Elementary Reading policy area.
Go to a policy lever Licensure Tests High-Quality Instructional Materials Preparation Program Approval Professional Learning Teacher Preparation Standards
Select a state Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Ohio’s Performance

Strong
NCTQ evaluates whether states effectively use this policy lever by examining whether they require inclusion of reading experts in instructional reviews, whether they review course syllabi as part of the program renewal process, use of pass rate data in program approval, and whether they maintain control of the program approval process. Explore the key actions below to learn more about how Ohio is implementing Preparation Program Approval policies to improve Elementary Reading.

Why does this matter?

Without detailed reviews, states cannot guarantee programs are adequately preparing teachers to teach reading. Clear evidence from teacher surveys1 and NCTQ’s Teacher Prep Review demonstrates that prep programs are not teaching aspiring elementary teachers about scientifically based reading instruction. Since programs have to be approved by states in order to operate, states should leverage their full authority to verify that policies are carried out in practice.

Why does Ohio stand out?

Ohio maintains full authority over its teacher preparation program approval process. As part of the program renewal process, the state reviews syllabi for reading courses to ensure integration of all reading standards and the science of reading. The state also incorporates licensure pass rate data into the program renewal process.

Ohio recently passed legislation that provides programs with feedback, an opportunity to improve, and then a high-stakes audit coupled with public transparency. The new legislation requires the Ohio Department of Education to complete the following actions:

  • Develop an audit process to review prep programs.
  • Complete an initial survey of prep programs.
  • Grant a one-year grace period for institutions to meet standards.
  • After one year, conduct audits of each institution.
  • Revoke approval for programs that are not in alignment and have not yet addressed findings of initial audit.
  • Develop and publish annual summaries of literacy instruction strategies and practices for all prep programs.
  • Develop a dashboard with first-time pass rates on the reading licensure test.

What are the key actions Ohio should take?

  • See what these states are doing in this policy area:

    Key Resources

    State of the States 2024: Elementary Reading

    Explore five policy actions states can take to strengthen implementation of the science of reading.

    State Reading Policy Action Guide

    Discover how states can implement and sustain strong reading instruction.

    Teacher Prep Review: Reading Foundations

    Learn more about how over 700 elementary teacher preparation programs are preparing educators to teach reading.

    More than just words: 7 Approaches to monitoring the implementation of reading laws

    Dive into how states are turning policy into practice.

    References
    1. EdWeek Research Center. (2020). Early reading instruction: Results of a national survey of K-2 and elementary special education teachers and postsecondary instructors. Washington, DC: Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/research-center/research-center-reports/early-reading-instruction-results-of-a-national-survey