Skip to Content
Skip to Content

Professional Learning

Learn more about how District of Columbia is performing on Professional Learning in the Elementary Reading policy area.
Go to a policy lever Licensure Tests High-Quality Instructional Materials Preparation Program Approval Professional Learning Teacher Preparation Standards
Select a state Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

District of Columbia's Performance

Strong
NCTQ evaluates whether states effectively use this policy lever by examining if they require in-service elementary teachers to participate in scientifically-based reading instruction professional learning and whether the state allocates funding for such programs. Explore the key actions below to learn more about how District of Columbia is implementing Professional Learning policies to improve Elementary Reading.

Why does this matter?

If teachers have the knowledge and skills to teach reading, they can have a greater positive impact on children’s literacy. Unfortunately, thousands of teachers are in classrooms right now without sufficient knowledge of the science of reading. States can help close the gap in teachers’ knowledge and skills by requiring and funding high-quality professional learning.

Why does D.C. stand out?

The District of Columbia requires training for all elementary teachers in scientifically-based reading instruction. The state also allocates funding for training in scientifically-based reading instruction for in-service teachers.

The District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) used ESSER funds from the pandemic to purchase training from TNTP on the science of reading. This training required a one-time payment of nearly $1 million from OSSE, and the training now lives on the state’s learning management system, where it is offered asynchronously to teachers across the state at no cost. The state also leveraged federal ESSER funding and Comprehensive Literacy State Development grant funding to provide Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Spelling (LETRS) training for a large share of teachers and administrators, with a heavier emphasis on early childhood teachers (D.C. offers free universal preschool). Between the money from the state and an additional push for this training from District of Columbia Public Schools (the traditional public school district within D.C.), altogether, nearly 10% of the teacher workforce has either started or completed training in scientifically-based reading instruction.

What are the key actions District of Columbia should take?

  • See what these exemplars are doing in this policy area:

    Key Resources

    State of the States 2024: Elementary Reading

    Explore five policy actions states can take to strengthen implementation of the science of reading.

    State Reading Policy Action Guide

    Discover how states can implement and sustain strong reading instruction.

    Teacher Prep Review: Reading Foundations

    Learn more about how over 700 elementary teacher preparation programs are preparing educators to teach reading.

    More than just words: 7 Approaches to monitoring the implementation of reading laws

    Dive into how states are turning policy into practice.

    References
    1. Folsom, J. S., Smith, K. G., Burk, K., & Oakley, N. (2017). Educator outcomes associated with implementation of Mississippi’s K–3 early literacy professional development initiative (REL 2017–270). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
    2. Hill, H., & Papay, J. (2022). Building Better PL: How to strengthen teacher learning determining what works in teacher professional learning. https://annenberg.brown.edu/sites/default/files/rppl-building-better-pl.pdf