Connecticut's Performance
Ungraded
Why does this matter?
Research suggests that observations are more likely to positively impact teachers’ effectiveness when they are connected directly to professional development opportunities.1
Why does Connecticut stand out?
Connecticut’s educator evaluation system emphasizes continuous growth and improvement in teacher practice. During the goal-setting conference, the evaluator and educator collaboratively identify an area for professional practice and a student learning growth goal. This process includes developing a professional learning plan and identifying supports to help the educator achieve their goals, focusing on both professional development and student impact.
The evaluation system employs a tiered support structure. Before any corrective action is considered, three levels of support must be implemented. Tier 1 support includes professional learning opportunities such as classroom visits, district resources, formal professional development, and instructional coaching. Tier 2 support builds upon Tier 1 activities by increasing the frequency and intensity of support. This might involve more frequent observations focused on specific classroom practices and more consistent feedback. Tier 3 support is developed in consultation with the evaluator, the educator, and their bargaining representative. If Tier 3 interventions are unsuccessful, a move toward a corrective action plan may be necessary.
What are the key actions Connecticut
should take?
Key Resources
State of the States 2022: Teacher and Principal Evaluation Policies
Explore NCTQ’s comprehensive analysis of state teacher and principal evaluation policies.
Rural teacher evaluation system shows promising results for students struggling in math
Learn more about how evaluation systems can improve outcomes in rural areas.
References
- Shaha, S. H., Glassett, K. F., & Copas, A. (2015). The impact of teacher observations with coordinated professional development on student performance: A 27-state program evaluation. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 55; Hunter, S. B. (2022). High-leverage teacher evaluation practices for instructional improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi:10.1177/17411432221112995.
- Shaha, S. H., Glassett, K. F., & Copas, A. (2015). The impact of teacher observations with coordinated professional development on student performance: A 27-state program evaluation. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 55; Hunter, S. B. (2022). High-leverage teacher evaluation practices for instructional improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi:10.1177/17411432221112995.