Delaware's Performance
Ungraded
Why does this matter?
Observations (particularly when they are based on a clearly defined rubric) provide a rich source of information about multiple aspects of a teacher’s skills and impact on students, and are a useful starting point for providing actionable, specific, and relevant feedback.1 States can support implementation by providing support such as training and calibration activities for observers in order to improve the fidelity of any evaluations system.
Why does Delaware stand out?
Delaware recently launched the Delaware Teacher Growth and Support System (DTGSS), a redesigned system for teacher evaluation. DTGSS features a new framework with three performance areas and nine indicators, designed to streamline observations and focus on research-based factors.
This new framework shifts the focus of observations to consider not only teacher actions but also the impact of those actions on student learning. The observation process offers flexibility, allowing observers to tailor their focus based on individual teacher needs. Observers are required to provide feedback after each observation to support teacher growth. A formal performance rating, based on the accumulated evidence from all observations, is only assigned at the end of the year. All teachers are required to be observed and receive feedback at least three times per year under this system.
What are the key actions Delaware
should take?
Key Resources
State of the States 2022: Teacher and Principal Evaluation Policies
Explore NCTQ’s comprehensive analysis of state teacher and principal evaluation policies.
Rural teacher evaluation system shows promising results for students struggling in math
Learn more about how evaluation systems can improve outcomes in rural areas.
References
- Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011); Marsh, J. A., Bush-Mecenas, S., Strunk, K. O., Lincove, J. A. & Huguet, A. (2017). Evaluating Teachers in the Big Easy: How Organizational Context Shapes Policy Responses in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 539–570; Stecher, B. M., Garet, M. S., Hamilton, L. S., Steiner, E. D., Robyn A., Poirier, J., Holtzman, D. J., Fulbeck, E. S., Chambers, J., & Brodziak de los Reyes, I. (2016). Improving Teaching Effectiveness: Implementation: The Intensive Partnerships for Effective Teaching Through 2013–2014. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from:https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1295.html; Strunk, K. O., Weinstein, T. L., & Makkonen, R. (2014). Sorting Out the Signal: Do Multiple Measures of Teachers’ Effectiveness Provide Consistent Information to Teachers and Principals? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(100), As of May 11, 2018: http://www.redalyc.org/html/2750/275031898100; Taylor, E. S. & Tyler, J. H. (2012).
- Cantrell, S. & Kane, T. J. (2013); Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Research Paper. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Measures of Effective Teaching project.
- Tuma, A. P., Hamilton, L. S., & Tsai, T. (2018). Of note, only five states (Delaware, New Mexico, Ohio, West Virginia, and Wisconsin) actually require four or more observations yearly for new teachers.