Skip to Content
Skip to Content

Licensure Tests

States should adopt a strong reading licensure test.

Data updated: March 2024

Go to a policy lever Licensure Tests High-Quality Instructional Materials Preparation Program Approval Professional Learning Teacher Preparation Standards
Select a state Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

Why focus on Licensure Tests to improve Elementary Reading?

Licensure tests provide a scalable and reliable measure that, with other evidence, can determine whether teachers are well prepared in the science of reading. While this is an area ripe for further research, the available evidence suggests that various measures of teachers’ knowledge of scientifically based reading instruction correlate with their students’ reading achievement gains.1 States with strong licensure tests can use results as indicators of programs’ strengths or shortcomings. The tests can also help verify that people who earn a teaching license truly do understand the science of reading.

State performance on Licensure Tests for Elementary Reading

Eighteen states (35%) have Strong performance in Licensure Tests for Elementary Reading

NCTQ evaluates whether states effectively use this policy lever by examining whether candidates are required to pass a reading licensure test, if they require the use of an acceptable reading test for elementary teacher candidates, and whether they publish relevant pass rate data. Learn more.

Explore the key actions below to learn more about how each state is implementing policies to improve Elementary Reading.

OHOH ALAL ARAR CACA GAGA AKAK COCO CTCT DEDE FLFL HIHI IDID ILIL ININ IAIA KSKS KYKY LALA MEME MAMA MIMI MNMN MSMS MOMO MTMT NENE NVNV NHNH NJNJ NMNM NYNY NCNC NDND OKOK OROR PAPA RIRI SCSC SDSD TNTN TXTX UTUT VTVT VA WAWA WVWV WIWI WYWY AZAZ
Strong
Moderate
Weak
Unacceptable
Ungraded

Who stands out?

What are the key actions states should take?

  • State of the States 2024: Elementary Reading

    Explore five policy actions states can take to strengthen implementation of the science of reading.

    State Reading Policy Action Guide

    Discover how states can implement and sustain strong reading instruction.

    Teacher Prep Review: Reading Foundations

    Learn more about how over 700 elementary teacher preparation programs are preparing educators to teach reading.

    More than just words: 7 Approaches to monitoring the implementation of reading laws

    Dive into how states are turning policy into practice.

    References
    1. Spear-Swerling, L., & Zibulsky, J. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1353-1378; Moats, L. C., & Foorman, B. R. (2003). Measuring teachers’ content knowledge of language and reading. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 23-45; Hudson, A. K., Moore, K. A., Han, B., Wee Koh, P., Binks-Cantrell, E., & Malatesha Joshi, R. (2021). Elementary teachers’ knowledge of foundational literacy skills: A critical piece of the puzzle in the science of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S287-S315; Piasta, S. B., Connor, C. M., Fishman, B. J., & Morrison, F. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 224-248.