Washington’s Performance
Ungraded
Explore the key policy levers below to learn more about how Washington is implementing Teacher Evaluation policies. (NCTQ does not assign rankings to states for this policy area.)
See how Washington performs across policy levers to support Teacher Evaluation
Strong
Moderate
Weak
Unacceptable
Ungraded
Why focus on Teacher Evaluation?
Research shows that evaluation, done well, can improve teacher practice, ultimately leading to better student outcomes.1 States should consider how they can support high-quality systems and district-level implementation to provide teachers with quality feedback, identify the best teachers, and foster ongoing professional growth.
Recommendations for Washington for Teacher Evaluation
Observations and Feedback
- Incorporate a process to certify the reliability of evaluators beyond attending training
- Permit other individuals beyond principals to be trained and certified observers within the teacher evaluation system
Professional Growth and Support
- Revise state policy to ensure that professional development for teachers is based on evaluation results
References
- Bleiberg, J., Brunner, E., Harbatkin, E., Kraft, M. A., & Springer, M. (2021). The Effect of Teacher Evaluation on Achievement and Attainment: Evidence from Statewide Reforms. (EdWorkingPaper: 21-496). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/b1ak-r251.