Ohio’s Performance
Ungraded
Explore the key policy levers below to learn more about how Ohio is implementing Teacher Evaluation policies. (NCTQ does not assign rankings to states for this policy area.)
See how Ohio performs across policy levers to support Teacher Evaluation
Strong
Moderate
Weak
Unacceptable
Ungraded
Why focus on Teacher Evaluation?
Research shows that evaluation, done well, can improve teacher practice, ultimately leading to better student outcomes.1 States should consider how they can support high-quality systems and district-level implementation to provide teachers with quality feedback, identify the best teachers, and foster ongoing professional growth.
Recommendations for Ohio for Teacher Evaluation
Observations and Feedback
- The state should require teachers to be evaluated annually
Professional Growth and Support
- Require that non-tenured teachers or teachers within their first three years receive observation and feedback early in the school year
References
- Bleiberg, J., Brunner, E., Harbatkin, E., Kraft, M. A., & Springer, M. (2021). The Effect of Teacher Evaluation on Achievement and Attainment: Evidence from Statewide Reforms. (EdWorkingPaper: 21-496). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/b1ak-r251.